18. 다음 글의 내용과 일치하지 않는 것은?

We entered a new phase as a species when Chinese scientists altered a human embryo to remove a potentially fatal blood disorder―not only from the baby, but all of its descendants. Researchers call this process "germline modification." The media likes the phrase "designer babies." But we should call it what it is, "eugenics." And we, the human race, need to decide whether or not we want to use it. Last month, in the United States, the scientific establishment weighed in. A National Academy of Sciences and National Academy of Medicine joint committee endorsed embryo editing aimed at genes that cause serious diseases when there is "no reasonable alternative." But it was more wary of editing for "enhancement," like making already-healthy children stronger or taller. It recommended a public discussion, and said that doctors should "not proceed at this time." The committee had good reason to urge caution. The history of eugenics is full of oppression and misery.
----------------------
※	eugenics: 우생학

• 1
   Doctors were recommended to immediately go ahead with embryo editing for enhancement.
• 2
   Recently, the scientific establishment in the U.S. joined a discussion on eugenics.
• 3
   Chinese scientists modified a human embryo to prevent a serious blood disorder.
• 4
   "Designer babies" is another term for the germline modification process.